[QoL] View previous contracts when sending a new contract

[intelitec]

Hi all - not sure if this has been suggested yet, but I think this is a feature that could help companies like mine save a ton of time. 

When updating prices for daily contracts, many of you will notice that you have to go back and forth between your 'warehouse' and 'outgoing' screens when trying to figure out what your previous contract was. This is a waste of time. 
I believe that it would benefit the game greatly if you could see recent contracts when creating a new one. This would not only save time, but also prevent some potentially financially catastrophic errors. 

I for one use contracts every single day as part of my business model (11 active daily) as I'm sure many of you do as well. I would greatly appreciate a more streamlined contracts experience and I know your customers would too. 

*edit* I am aware of the 'Recent movements' feature, however I find it difficult to read easily. A contracts overview would be better*

[vlad]

Maybe can explain what you like to see that is better than recent movement button area?

[intelitec]

Nov 29, 2020 20:31:12 GMT vlad said:

Maybe can explain what you like to see that is better than recent movement button area?

Like I said, I find that the recent movements area is tougher to read mainly because it's ordered by date and it is very easy to miss someone if you are adjusting your prices. This problem is aggregated when you have 10+ daily customers.

The contracts overview tab could provide one with a central location to send and receive contracts, as well as viewing all contracts by customer, or by resource, over the last 24 - 48 hrs.
When sending a contract, a table showing all of your customers who bought this resource, their respective quantities and pp/u could appear to make things more organized.
It could be very similar to the inflow/outflow tabs, just more centralized and contract focused. 

I just find the contracts system janky so I'm not sure exactly how this would function, however I am sure there is a better way to organize this.